top of page


Photo by Connor Coyne on Unsplash

A Lisbon court sentenced Rui Pinto, the individual behind Football Leaks, to a four-year suspended prison term for attempted extortion, illegal access to data, and breach of correspondence. The decision comes despite Pinto's revelations leading to tax evasion convictions, an investigation into Cristiano Ronaldo's alleged misdeeds, and exposing rule-breaking by Manchester City and other clubs. These revelations have reshaped public understanding of the sports industry and heightened scrutiny of questionable practices within the field.

Pinto argued he was a whistleblower, but the judge ruled he couldn't enjoy legal protection for this role, as he had committed crimes to acquire the sensitive data. The judge noted that Pinto and his lawyer attempted to extort between 500,000 and 1 million euros from investment fund Doyen Sports. Pinto was pardoned for 77 of the 90 charges he faced under a youth amnesty program. Despite relief over the suspended sentence, the defense expressed concerns about additional charges that have been "artificially separated" from this case.

Irrespective of its specific circumstances, this case highlights a societal paradox in our social structure. While society values whistleblowers for the crucial information they bring to light, it doesn't offer them enough protection. These individuals risk their finances, personal lives, and careers, yet the safeguards in place for them are lacking. The society that gains from their revelations often fails to provide adequate support.

See Goncalves (2023), "Football Leaks' Rui Pinto gets suspended sentence, to remain free," Sept. 11, 2023, Reuters:


bottom of page