top of page
CRN41LSAImage.JPG

​This webpage is dedicated to the activities of the Collaborative Research Network "Economic Crime and Corporate Compliance" (CRN41), established under the umbrella of the Law and Society Association (LSA). In recognition of their shared research objectives and interdisciplinary focus, CRN41 and the Corporate Crime Observatory have established a synergy to enhance the visibility and impact of their collaborative research in the areas of financial crime and corporate compliance.

 

The founding members of the CRN41 are Diane Ring (Boston College), Costantino Grasso (University of Exeter), Donato Vozza (Aston University), Li Huang (Seattle University), and Stephen Holden (De Montfort University).

The overarching aim of CRN41 is to create a multi-disciplinary global forum for research and collaboration on economic crime and the development of measures by institutions and businesses to mitigate organizational risks and misconduct. Researchers have established a long-term dialogue on traditional economic crimes such as corruption, tax evasion, money laundering, fraud, insider trading, terrorism financing, and cybercrime, as well as interconnected criminal practices such as environmental crimes and corporate homicide. The research efforts also include socially harmful organizational behaviours, including unethical lobbying, tax abuses, and environmental degradation. Also, prevalent trends in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), and Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) will be explored to evaluate the adequacy of such approaches to mitigate harmful behavior and develop new potential solutions. Finally, the work of the network is also characterised by a special focus on the role of transparency, whistleblowing, and emerging technologies including AI.

The research efforts of the members of the Collaborative Research Network 41 (CRN41) on Economic Crime and Corporate Compliance culminated, at the Law & Society Association 2026 meeting in San Francisco, in one of the most ambitious programmes the network has yet assembled: seven paper sessions and two roundtables (full program available here). Drawing together academics, judges, prosecutors, and practitioners from across at least ten jurisdictions on four continents.

The governing idea of the event was the notion of "
sanctuary." The metaphor was chosen for its deliberate double valence. A sanctuary is, in its first sense, a place of refuge and protection: the safe harbour that society relies upon to safeguard public well-being, market integrity, and human dignity. Yet the same structures that promise protection can be inverted into shelters of a very different kind: the grey zones, jurisdictional seams, and definitional boundaries within which sophisticated corporate actors evade accountability while remaining formally compliant. The programme set out to interrogate this inversion; to ask how law builds sanctuaries, how those sanctuaries are captured, when they fail, and how they might be redesigned to serve the public rather than shield the powerful.
 

​

This conceptual frame was theorised in all the sessions starting from the first one entitled "Architecture of Impunity: How Legal Design Enables Avoidance and Evasion." Here, the analysis turned to the mechanism itself: how regulatory architectures, discursive framing, voluntary "soft law," and temporal gaps in oversight combine to construct surface-level legitimacy while enabling avoidance beneath it. Then, the programme developed along three argued movements. The first examined the corporate giant as the paradigmatic beneficiary of the captured sanctuary. Across the two-part series "Holding the Giants Accountable," contributors dissected the doctrinal and structural devices through which multinational enterprises frustrate liability. The second movement traced the corruption of a sanctuary in its most literal and intimate form. The two-part series "Beyond the Label" examined the food industry to reveal how corporate actors prioritising profit over health turn that sanctuary against the public it should serve.  The third movement confronted the most analytically difficult terrain: the ambiguous boundary at which lawful organisations cease to be guardians and become enablers. The two-part series "Guardians or Enablers" investigated how legitimate corporate structures may serve either as institutional sanctuaries against criminal infiltration or as gateways for it. These scholarly inquiries were brought into direct dialogue with practice in the programme's two roundtables. "Stone Fortress or Paper Castle? Debating the Current Reality of Corporate Compliance" scrutinised whether compliance blueprints such as the Three Lines Model build a genuine sanctuary of integrity or a fragile illusion. Finally, "Criminalizing Retaliation: Advancing Legal Remedies for Whistleblower Trauma" addressed the gravest case of all, examining whether retaliation that inflicts serious psychological injury should be reclassified as a prosecutable harm.

Taken together, the CRN41 sessions in San Francisco mapped a single arc: how legal and institutional structures build sanctuary, how that sanctuary is captured and corrupted, what happens when it fails, and how it might be reconstructed to bridge the persistent gap between formal compliance and substantive accountability. In sustaining this multi-disciplinary, transnational, and practice-oriented dialogue, the network reaffirmed its founding ambition, which is to confront the evolving challenges of economic crime by uniting rigorous scholarship with the lived realities of enforcement.

​​

Architecture of Impunity: How Legal Design Enables Avoidance and Evasion

  • Type: Paper Session

  • Date: May 28, 2025

  • Organizer: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter 

  • Chair & Discussant: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Description: This session examined how legal design creates spaces for avoiding accountability while remaining formally compliant. The panel investigated "grey zones": regulatory architectures, definitional boundaries, and jurisdictional seams exploited by sophisticated corporate actors. They analyzed how discursive framing sanitized structural conflicts and how jurisdictional mismatches generated safe harbors for abuse. The session explored the tension between flexibility and enforceability, where voluntary soft law and constitutional immunities shielded governance failures. By examining gaps in oversight, panelists identified a recurring pattern: legal architectures that projected legitimacy while facilitating avoidance. 

  • Panelists:

    • Karl Guebert, University of Ottawa

    • Chaosheng Chiang, National Chung Cheng University

    • Andrea Sandbrink, Freie Universität Berlin

​​

Holding the Giants Accountable – Part I: Challenges in the Age of Multinational Corporations

  • Type: Paper Session

  • Date: May 28, 2026

  • Organizer: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

  • Chair & Discussant: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Description: This session examined challenges in public and private enforcement against Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) and the "sanctuaries" they use to evade accountability. Panelists discussed obstacles to holding MNEs liable for misconduct. The discussion explored how MNEs use resources, complex corporate structures, and state acquiescence to obstruct liability and evidence gathering. It also considered whether they exploit legal protections and fundamental rights originally intended for natural persons, and whether extending such advantages to powerful corporate actors undermines justice.

  • Panelists:

    • Penny Crofts, University of Technology, Sydney

    • Angelo Parisi, Court of Appeal, Milan

    • Donato Vozza, Aston University

    • Guanqun Qin, Durham University ​

​​

Holding the Giants Accountable – Part II: Challenges in the Age of Multinational Corporations

  • Type: Paper Session

  • Date: May 29, 2026

  • Organizer: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

  • Chair & Discussant: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Description: This session examined challenges in public and private enforcement against Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) and the "sanctuaries" they use to evade accountability. Panelists discussed obstacles to holding MNEs liable for misconduct. The discussion explored how MNEs use resources, complex corporate structures, and state acquiescence to obstruct liability and evidence gathering. It also considered whether they exploit legal protections and fundamental rights originally intended for natural persons, and whether extending such advantages to powerful corporate actors undermines justice.

  • Panelists:

    • Yotam Berger, Stanford Law School

    • Rafael Quintero Godinez, University College Dublin (UCD)

    • June Kim, University of Michigan Law School 

​​​

Beyond the Label - Part I: Irresponsible Behavior and Regulatory Failures in the Food Industry

  • Type: Paper Session

  • Date: May 29, 2026

  • Organizer: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

  • Chair & Discussant: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Description: This session examined irresponsible food industry practices that prioritize profit over public health. Panelists discussed deceptive marketing, misleading labeling, and the promotion of ultra-processed foods. The discussion addressed corporate hypocrisy, including the use of CSR messaging to obscure harmful business models, and explored how foods are engineered to encourage overconsumption. It also assessed the limits of current regulatory responses.

  • Panelists:

    • Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

    • Roberta De Paolis, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies

    • Arianna Zeidi, University of Exeter

​​​

Beyond the Label - Part II: Irresponsible Behavior and Regulatory Failures in the Food Industry

  • Type: Roundtable Session

  • Date: May 29, 2026

  • Organizer: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

  • Chair & Discussant: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Description: This session examined irresponsible food industry practices that prioritize profit over public health. Panelists discussed deceptive marketing, misleading labeling, and the promotion of ultra-processed foods. The discussion addressed corporate hypocrisy, including the use of CSR messaging to obscure harmful business models, and explored how foods are engineered to encourage overconsumption. It also assessed the limits of current regulatory responses.

  • Panelists:

    • Gaia Fiorinelli, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies

    • Irene Nohara, Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie

    • Federica Raffone, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

​​​

Guardians or Enablers - Part I: Lawful Organizations and Criminal Networks

  • Type: Roundtable Session

  • Date: May 29, 2026

  • Organizer: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

  • Chair & Discussant: Penny Crofts, University of Technology, Sydney

  • Description: This session examined the complex relationship between lawful organizations and criminal networks as well as their socio-economic consequences. Papers explored how organizations act as safeguards against criminal infiltration, asset concealment, and market distortion, or how they become facilitators of illicit activity. The discussion addressed legal and socio-economic vulnerabilities that enable these dynamics and considered regulatory strategies to strengthen institutional and societal resilience.

  • Panelists:

    • Maria Cristina Ribera, Judge, Council of Europe Representative (Italy)

    • Li Huang, Seattle University

    • Annalisa Mangiaracina, University of Palermo.

​

​​​​

Criminalizing Retaliation: Advancing Legal Remedies for Whistleblower Trauma

  • Type: Roundtable Session

  • Date: May 30, 2026

  • Organizer: Jacqueline Garrick, Whistleblowers of America

  • Chair & Discussant: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Description: Retaliation against whistleblowers can cause severe psychological, professional, and financial harm. This roundtable examined whether such retaliation should be treated as a criminal offense, particularly when it results in serious mental injury. Drawing on legal and empirical research, participants assessed the limits of civil remedies and considered whether retaliation warrants criminal accountability comparable to other forms of coercive or harmful conduct.

  • Panelists:

    • Mary Inman, Whistleblower Partners LLP

    • Jacqueline Garrick, Whistleblowers of America

    • Michael Zummer, Accountability FBI, Inc.

    • Joseph Wade, Whistleblowers of America

​​

​​​

Guardians or Enablers - Part II: Lawful Organizations and Criminal Networks

  • Type: Roundtable Session

  • Date: May 30, 2026

  • Organizer: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

  • Chair & Discussant: Donato Vozza, Aston University

  • Description: This session examined the complex relationship between lawful organizations and criminal networks as well as their socio-economic consequences. Papers explored how organizations act as safeguards against criminal infiltration, asset concealment, and market distortion, or how they become facilitators of illicit activity. The discussion addressed legal and socio-economic vulnerabilities that enable these dynamics and considered regulatory strategies to strengthen institutional and societal resilience.

  • Panelists:

    • Giulio Vanacore, Office of the Prosecutor, Naples, Italy

    • Rafael Pucci, Universidade de São Paulo

    • Emmanuel Pagano, Law firm

​

​​​​​

Stone Fortress or Paper Castle? Debating the Current Reality of Corporate Compliance

  • Type: Roundtable Session

  • Date: May 30, 2026

  • Organizer: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

  • Chair & Discussant: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Description: This roundtable examined corporate integrity through organizational design, human judgment, and technology. Panelists assessed whether compliance frameworks remain fit for purpose, explored the challenges faced by internal gatekeepers such as compliance officers and auditors, and discussed the tensions between reporting duties and whistleblowing. The session also considered AI's dual role as both a tool for strengthening compliance and a source of new risks and vulnerabilities.s.

  • Panelists:

    • Mary Inman, Whistleblower Partners LLP

    • Glenn Sorrentino, Hush Line

    • Maro Polykarpou, Aston University

    • Francesco Maria D'Angelo, University of Udine

    • Ashu Sharma, Association of Corporate Investigators

​

​The research efforts of the members of the Collaborative Research Network 41 (CRN41) on Economic Crime and Corporate Compliance led to the organization of several insightful paper sessions and roundtables at the Law & Society Association 2025 meeting in Chicago. The CRN41 sessions collectively fostered a rich, multi-disciplinary, and global dialogue, bringing together experts from numerous institutions across at least 10 countries. This broad participation enriched the debate on the "Ecosystem of Truth," featuring significant contributions from academics and practitioners from the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, Brazil, Canada, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Nigeria, among others. The diverse perspectives from institutions such as Aston University, Boston College, Exeter University, Flinders University, University of Leiden, Luiss University, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, the University of Oklahoma, the University of Manchester, the University of São Paulo, the University of Saskatchewan, Seattle University, and Utrecht University, alongside non-academic bodies like the Office of the Prosecutor in Naples and Whistleblowers of America, were instrumental in dissecting these complex issues and crafting a path toward greater accountability.

​

These sessions directly reflected pressing contemporary themes surrounding corporate accountability and the mechanisms for exposing misconduct. The work was thematically anchored by the idea of an "Ecosystem of Truth," a conceptual framework advanced by Prof. Costantino Grasso, which examines the interconnected roles of various actors in safeguarding democratic and social well-being. This concept was most directly addressed in the paper session titled "The Ecosystem of Truth: How Investigative Journalism, Whistleblowing, and Leaks Safeguard Democracy." This cornerstone panel explored how investigative journalists serve as a crucial mechanism for uncovering corruption and wrongdoing and tackled the significant challenges they face, such as the use of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) to silence reporting.

 

The themes of this session resonated deeply throughout the other CRN41 panels. For instance, the critical role of whistleblowing—often intertwined with journalistic reporting as a "disclosure of last resort"—was further explored in depth during the roundtable "Whistleblowing in Democracy: Safeguarding Justice, Transparency, and Organizational Integrity". Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives from law, economics, and ethics, this session explicitly examined how whistleblowers contribute to justice and transparency despite facing significant challenges like retaliation and systemic obstacles. Moreover, broader themes of accountability and the mechanisms for uncovering wrongdoing were evident in sessions that, at first glance, seemed to have a different focus. The session "Beyond Profit: Redefining Corporate Accountability in a Globalized World" directly addressed the challenge of holding corporations responsible for their impacts on human rights and the environment. It dissected the legal mechanisms and corporate strategies used to evade liability and highlighted the crucial role of litigation and enforcement in promoting sustainability. This thematic web extended to the examination of regulatory systems and their failures. The session "Navigating the Regulatory Maze: Compliance, Consequences, and Criminality" delved into the complexities of regulatory frameworks, including critical issues like regulatory capture, as exemplified by a paper on the EPA's allegedly fraudulent assessment of 'forever pesticides'. Similarly, the panel on "Mandatory Regulation vs. Self-regulation" bridged the gap between "corporate narratives and real-world impact" , questioning the effectiveness of self-regulation and raising concerns about "symbolic compliance." The "Ecosystem of Truth" concept was also contextualized within the modern digital landscape. The roundtable "Disinformation, Corporate Compliance and Enforcement" tackled the accountability of online platforms in the fight against disinformation and online crime, comparing the regulatory models in Europe and the United States. Complementing this, the "Tech-Powered Disclosures" roundtable explored the transformative role of technology and Artificial Intelligence in supporting this ecosystem by improving the effectiveness of internal disclosures and the autonomous detection of misconduct.

​​

Beyond Profit: Redefining Corporate Accountability in a Globalized World

  • Type: Paper Session

  • Date: May 23, 2025

  • Organizer: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Chair: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

  • Discussant: Donato Vozza, Aston University

  • Description: This session explored the evolving landscape of corporate accountability. The papers examined how legal frameworks are being challenged to hold corporations responsible for their impact on human rights, the environment, and society. The discussion delved into emerging legal mechanisms, including due diligence, and investigated the shifting focus of corporate law from shareholder interests to broader concerns.

  • Panelists:

    • Bonheur Minzoto, University of Manchester

    • Giuseppe Di Vetta, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies

    • Nathalia Sandoval Rojas, FGV RI

    • Elena Calsamiglia, European University Insitute

    • Rafael Pucci, Universidade De Sao Paulo USP

    • Lisa Harms, University of Leiden

​

​​

The Ecosystem of Truth: How Investigative Journalism, Whistleblowing, and Leaks Safeguard Democracy

  • Type: Paper Session

  • Date: May 23, 2025

  • Organizer: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

  • Chair & Discussant: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Description: This session examined the critical role of investigative journalism in safeguarding democracy and ensuring accountability. Panelists explored how journalists uncover corruption and wrongdoing, the challenges they faced, including Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs), and the relationship between investigative journalism and prosecutorial action.

  • Panelists:

    • Ana Claudia Farranha Santana, Universidade de Brasilia - UnB

    • Giulio Vanacore, Office of the Prosecutor Naples Italy

    • Stephen Holden, De Montfort University

    • Annalisa Mangiaracina, University of Palermo

    • Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

​

​​

Mandatory Regulation vs. Self-regulation: Bridging the Gap Between Corporate Narratives and Real-World Impact

  • Type: Paper Session

  • Date: May 23, 2025

  • Organizer: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

  • Chair: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Discussant: Jennifer Taub, Vermont Law School

  • Description: This session explored the tension between mandatory regulation and corporate self-regulation. It examined case studies where corporate claims of responsibility were juxtaposed with the tangible outcomes of their practices and assessed the effectiveness of self-regulation in fostering genuine corporate accountability.

  • Panelists:

    • Li Huang, Seattle University

    • Roberta De Paolis, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies

    • Jennifer Epoyun-William, University of Essex Online

    • Daniel Ostas, University of Oklahoma Price College of Business

    • Daniela Arantes Prata, Law Department, London School of Economics

​

​​​

Navigating the Regulatory Maze: Compliance, Consequences, and Criminality

  • Type: Paper Session

  • Date: May 24, 2025

  • Organizer: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Chair & Discussant: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Description: This session delved into the complex relationship between power, regulation, and behavior within organizations. It examined how actors responded to regulatory frameworks, the effectiveness of regulatory efforts, and their unintended consequences, including financial irregularities, unethical conduct, and regulatory capture.

  • Panelists:

    • Maisie Hopkins, Utrecht University

    • Heraclitos Muhire, Lund University, Sociology of Law

    • Pietro Maria Sabella, Luiss University

    • Roy Gava, University of St. Gallen

​

​​​

Disinformation, Corporate Compliance and Enforcement. Platforms' Accountability and Regulatory Models Between Europe and US

  • Type: Roundtable Session

  • Date: May 23, 2025

  • Organizer: Antonio Gullo, Luiss University

  • Chair & Discussant: Antonio Gullo, Luiss University

  • Description: This interdisciplinary roundtable addressed the involvement of large corporations, particularly online platforms, in combating online crimes and disinformation. The discussion focused on a comparison between the US experience and recent European legislation, seeking a balance between a public-private partnership and avoiding a "blank delegation" of content moderation to digital operators.

  • Panelists:

    • Irene Pasquetto, University of Maryland, College Park

    • Emanuele Birritteri, University of Rome Unitelma Sapienza

    • Rossella Sabia, Luiss University

    • Scott Shackelford, Indiana University - Bloomington

​

​The research efforts of the members of the Collaborative Research Network 41 (CRN41) on Economic Crime and Corporate Compliance led to the organization of several insightful paper sessions and roundtables (full program available here) at the Law & Society Association 2025 meeting in Chicago. The CRN41 sessions collectively fostered a rich, multi-disciplinary, and global dialogue, bringing together experts from numerous institutions across at least 10 countries. This broad participation enriched the debate on the "Ecosystem of Truth," featuring significant contributions from academics and practitioners from the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, Brazil, Canada, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Nigeria, among others. The diverse perspectives from academics serving at several institutions such as Aston University, Boston College, Exeter University, Flinders University, University of Leiden, Luiss University, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, the University of Oklahoma, the University of Manchester, the University of São Paulo, the University of Saskatchewan, Seattle University, and Utrecht University, alongside experts from other organizations like the Office of the Prosecutor in Naples and Whistleblowers of America, were instrumental in dissecting these complex issues and crafting a path toward greater accountability.

​

These sessions directly reflected pressing contemporary themes surrounding corporate accountability and the mechanisms for exposing misconduct. The work was thematically anchored by the idea of an "Ecosystem of Truth," a conceptual framework advanced by Prof. Costantino Grasso, which examines the interconnected roles of various actors in safeguarding democratic and social well-being. This concept was most directly addressed in the paper session titled "The Ecosystem of Truth: How Investigative Journalism, Whistleblowing, and Leaks Safeguard Democracy." This cornerstone panel explored how investigative journalists serve as a crucial mechanism for uncovering corruption and wrongdoing and tackled the significant challenges they face, such as the use of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) to silence reporting.

The themes of this session resonated deeply throughout the other CRN41 panels. For instance, the critical role of whistleblowing—often intertwined with journalistic reporting as a "disclosure of last resort"—was further explored in depth during the roundtable "Whistleblowing in Democracy: Safeguarding Justice, Transparency, and Organizational Integrity." Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives from law, economics, and ethics, this session explicitly examined how whistleblowers contribute to justice and transparency despite facing significant challenges like retaliation and systemic obstacles. Moreover, broader themes of accountability and the mechanisms for uncovering wrongdoing were evident in sessions that, at first glance, seemed to have a different focus. The session "Beyond Profit: Redefining Corporate Accountability in a Globalized World" directly addressed the challenge of holding corporations responsible for their impacts on human rights and the environment. It dissected the legal mechanisms and corporate strategies used to evade liability and highlighted the crucial role of litigation and enforcement in promoting sustainability. This thematic web extended to the examination of regulatory systems and their failures. The session "Navigating the Regulatory Maze: Compliance, Consequences, and Criminality" delved into the complexities of regulatory frameworks, including critical issues like regulatory capture. Similarly, the panel on "Mandatory Regulation vs. Self-regulation" bridged the gap between "corporate narratives and real-world impact," questioning the effectiveness of self-regulation and raising concerns about "symbolic compliance." The "Ecosystem of Truth" concept was also contextualized within the modern digital landscape. The roundtable "Disinformation, Corporate Compliance and Enforcement" tackled the accountability of online platforms in the fight against disinformation and online crime, comparing the regulatory models in Europe and the United States. Complementing this, the "Tech-Powered Disclosures" roundtable explored the transformative role of technology and Artificial Intelligence in supporting this ecosystem by improving the effectiveness of internal disclosures and the autonomous detection of misconduct.

​​

Beyond Profit: Redefining Corporate Accountability in a Globalized World

  • Type: Paper Session

  • Date: May 23, 2025

  • Organizer: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Chair: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

  • Discussant: Donato Vozza, Aston University

  • Description: This session explored the evolving landscape of corporate accountability. The papers examined how legal frameworks are being challenged to hold corporations responsible for their impact on human rights, the environment, and society. The discussion delved into emerging legal mechanisms, including due diligence, and investigated the shifting focus of corporate law from shareholder interests to broader concerns.

  • Panelists:

    • Bonheur Minzoto, University of Manchester

    • Giuseppe Di Vetta, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies

    • Nathalia Sandoval Rojas, FGV RI

    • Elena Calsamiglia, European University Institute

    • Rafael Pucci, Universidade De Sao Paulo USP

    • Lisa Harms, University of Leiden

​

​​

The Ecosystem of Truth: How Investigative Journalism, Whistleblowing, and Leaks Safeguard Democracy

  • Type: Paper Session

  • Date: May 23, 2025

  • Organizer: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

  • Chair & Discussant: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Description: This session examined the critical role of investigative journalism in safeguarding democracy and ensuring accountability. Panelists explored how journalists uncover corruption and wrongdoing, the challenges they faced, including Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs), and the relationship between investigative journalism and prosecutorial action.

  • Panelists:

    • Ana Claudia Farranha Santana, Universidade de Brasilia - UnB

    • Giulio Vanacore, Office of the Prosecutor Naples Italy

    • Stephen Holden, De Montfort University

    • Annalisa Mangiaracina, University of Palermo

    • Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

​

​​

Mandatory Regulation vs. Self-regulation: Bridging the Gap Between Corporate Narratives and Real-World Impact

  • Type: Paper Session

  • Date: May 23, 2025

  • Organizer: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

  • Chair: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Discussant: Jennifer Taub, Vermont Law School

  • Description: This session explored the tension between mandatory regulation and corporate self-regulation. It examined case studies where corporate claims of responsibility were juxtaposed with the tangible outcomes of their practices and assessed the effectiveness of self-regulation in fostering genuine corporate accountability.

  • Panelists:

    • Li Huang, Seattle University

    • Roberta De Paolis, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies

    • Jennifer Epoyun-William, University of Essex Online

    • Daniel Ostas, University of Oklahoma Price College of Business

​

​​​

Navigating the Regulatory Maze: Compliance, Consequences, and Criminality

  • Type: Paper Session

  • Date: May 24, 2025

  • Organizer: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Chair & Discussant: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Description: This session delved into the complex relationship between power, regulation, and behavior within organizations. It examined how actors responded to regulatory frameworks, the effectiveness of regulatory efforts, and their unintended consequences, including financial irregularities, unethical conduct, and regulatory capture.

  • Panelists:

    • Maisie Hopkins, Utrecht University

    • Heraclitos Muhire, Lund University, Sociology of Law

    • Pietro Maria Sabella, Luiss University

    • Roy Gava, University of St. Gallen

​

​​​

Disinformation, Corporate Compliance and Enforcement. Platforms' Accountability and Regulatory Models Between Europe and US

  • Type: Roundtable Session

  • Date: May 23, 2025

  • Organizer: Antonio Gullo, Luiss University

  • Chair & Discussant: Antonio Gullo, Luiss University

  • Description: This interdisciplinary roundtable addressed the involvement of large corporations, particularly online platforms, in combating online crimes and disinformation. The discussion focused on a comparison between the US experience and recent European legislation, seeking a balance between a public-private partnership and avoiding a "blank delegation" of content moderation to digital operators.

  • Panelists:

    • Irene Pasquetto, University of Maryland, College Park

    • Emanuele Birritteri, University of Rome Unitelma Sapienza

    • Rossella Sabia, Luiss University

    • Scott Shackelford, Indiana University - Bloomington

​

​​​

Tech-Powered Disclosures: The Role of Technology and Artificial Intelligence in Countering Organizational Misconduct

  • Type: Roundtable Session

  • Date: May 24, 2025

  • Organizer: Stephen Holden, De Montfort University

  • Chair & Discussant: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Description: This roundtable explored the transformative role of technology and AI in enhancing internal corporate transparency and compliance. Participants discussed how AI-driven tools can support compliance systems in identifying potential misconduct autonomously, without relying only on employee reports.

  • Panelists:

    • Vivienne Brand, Flinders University

    • Gaia Fiorinelli, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa

    • Glenn Sorrentino, Science & Design, Inc.

    • Douglas Arner, University of Hong Kong

    • Elisabetta Pietrocarlo, Luiss University

​

  • Download the full summary of the Roundtable "Tech-Powered Disclosures" here.

reportdowload.png

​​​​

Whistleblowing in Democracy: Safeguarding Justice, Transparency, and Organizational Integrity

  • Type: Roundtable Session

  • Date: May 24, 2025

  • Organizer: Costantino Grasso, University of Exeter

  • Chair & Discussant: Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

  • Description: This roundtable explored the critical role of whistleblowing in contemporary democratic societies, focusing on its impact on public and private organizations. The discussion examined how whistleblowers contribute to safeguarding justice and transparency despite facing significant challenges, such as retaliation and systemic obstacles.

  • Panelists:

    • Jacqueline Garrick, Whistleblowers of America

    • Donato Vozza, Aston University

    • Michael Zummer, Accountability FBI, Inc.

    • Dawn Carpenter, Georgetown University

    • Ashu Sharma, Association of Corporate Investigators

​

© 2021 The Corporate Crime Observatory
To contact us and for any general inquiries, please fill in the
contact form at the bottom of the homepage.

  • LinkedIn Social Icon
bottom of page